Big update in stable / nspy and serial fixes

Andy Green andy at
Thu Jul 3 17:19:38 CEST 2008

Hash: SHA1

Somebody in the thread at some point said:

| I don't really understand your code yet, but what I am doing at the
| moment is removing the three patches with nspy in the name and then
| going through removing all the nspy calls in the other patches using
| only the blinding light of my ignorance to guide me.
| If that sounds like a bad idea to you, let me know.
|> It doesn't sound like a good use of your time, honestly.
|> At this point, just remove all the "mw" patches from the andy branch
|> entirely.  I'll submit a patch to pull out the remaining fragments of
|> those patches from the stable to clean that out entirely.
|> And then when I have time (this weekend, perhaps) I'll re-do the patch
|> sets on separate branches on my site, and those interested can figure
|> out which particular patches they find acceptable and of interest as
|> time goes on.

Well it's a way forward, but it basically means divergence when the way
to get the best bits of these patches in here is open.  I don't mind
putting the work in to patch on top of your patchset to do the callbacks
and so on that seem important in our context.  But my problem is testing it.

- -Andy
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -


More information about the openmoko-kernel mailing list