[Bug 80] wakeup reason not in /proc/cmdline

Andy Green andy at openmoko.com
Wed Jun 4 08:53:41 CEST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Somebody in the thread at some point said:

| I'm not sure we want to do anything about the sysfs names, but we
| should clean up any kernel-internal uses of "Neo1073" in preparation
| for the Great Upstream Merge. Holger already did quite a bit of this
| janitorial work a while ago, so I hope that the remaining changes
| won't be too messy.

OK, but "clean up any kernel-internal uses of "Neo1973"" to what then?
Does it make sense if the sysfs names remain as neo1973?

- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkhGO/UACgkQOjLpvpq7dMqaUQCfUt6uGP79ZUf7uxeEA7e+prS5
oVoAniMZD+pQW+/cQXMJ14IsXAy5zV4O
=Q4mX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the openmoko-kernel mailing list