[Bug 80] wakeup reason not in /proc/cmdline

[Michael 'Mickey' Lauer]

On Wednesday 04 June 2008 10:25:43 Andy Green wrote:
> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> | Andy Green wrote:
> |> OK, but "clean up any kernel-internal uses of "Neo1973"" to what then?
> |
> | Hmm, this will be an interesting brainstorming exercise ;-)
>
> Wow it was actually "undefined at link time", not just my failure to
> understand what you meant.
>
> | Some possibilities would be "Openmoko", "Neo", "GTA0x", "GTA01_02", or
>
> If "neo" is OK why not just leave it alone as a similarly opaque token
> "neo1973", job done.

Finally a sane recommendation -- matching with the first thing that I said 
when marketing dropped this term into the wild.

Please: Lets ignore the FreeRunner term completely and just keep neo1973 for 
the family of 01, 02, 03, and then use the individual codenames to 
differenciate.

:M: