[PATCH 0/9] various mainly pcf50633 resume improvements / Ooooh

[Holger Freyther]

On Saturday 14 June 2008 11:30:50 Andy Green wrote:
> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> |> Despite we made some real progress in fact the whole suspend / resume
> |> thing remains extremely fragile due to probably just one or two more
> |> monsters in the deep shadows we never understood yet.  And they're the
> |> kind of monsters that attack if you go hunting for them:
> |> no_console_suspend on the kernel commandline kills resume the same way
> |> as mdelay() in glamo suspend stuff, and equally with no real trace of
> |> how or why it blew chunks.
> |
> | It works for a few times, then seems to crash. If I comment out the
> | dev_info ()and msleep() calls in pcf50633_work it seems to be OK. Also,
>
> OK I think I just had a "major breakthrough in understanding" why
> suspend action can be time-critical :-)

cool.