cpufreq

[Werner Almesberger]

Andy Green wrote:
> It's pretty invasive and looked like it would increase instability for
> us when we were already unstable.

In terms of trouble potential, I'd say it's kinda GSM mux and
suspend/resume rolled into one ...

> s3c2442 is actively hostile to dynamic clock changes so it's not the
> patchset's fault, it's try to do the best job that can be done.

Yup. Cesar got amazingly far in pushing the boundary between possible
and impossible :-)

- Werner