Merging the andy branch into the stable branch

[Sean McNeil]

Andy Green wrote:
> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> | Hey Andy,
> |
> | there are currently 17 patches in your branch that aren't in the stable
> | branch. I would like to see the backlight changes and my pcf50633
> changes in
> | the stable branch. This is only leaving the bt timeouts, glamo debug
> and MMC
> | unsafe resume patch.
> |
> | Do you plan to merge these to the stable branch? May I merge the
> backlight
> | changes and pcf50633 ones?
>
> Holger, the idea of the andy branch is to test things to see if they
> will bust the stable branch before we put them in there.
>
> I didn't hear any feedback about the important changes in LL debug which
> also has the MMC unsafe resume patches.  Are you running the andy
> patchset or is anyone running it except me?
>
> There's not much point sitting on these patches for QA if nobody is Aing
> the Q.  If nobody has any feedback I will stick the whole lot on stable
> in the next hours (yeah it isn't I forgot how to put patches on stable
> myself).
>
> -Andy
As you must have noticed from my one patch, there is at least 1 person 
testing out your branch :)