this week work on KBOOT
Andy Green
andy at openmoko.com
Sat May 31 17:02:09 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Dear Xiangfu,
| sounds good!
| I wouldn't worry about being slow at the beginning. Openmoko is big and
| once you spend some time to understand the system, you will become a lot
| faster in the future.
|
| Andy, are you saying we should not use Kexec/Kboot? Just a reduced u-boot?
| Unfortunately Werner is on vacation so we have to guess what he would say.
| Can you settle on something and give Xiangfu clear direction? Then
| hopefully once Werner is back he will agree with that...
I explained over a month ago that kexec / kboot is not critical for us
compared to bootloader simplification.
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/openmoko-kernel/2008-April/002561.html
Clear direction:
1) reduce the bootloader to a minimum and use the fixed worst-case
partitioning offset method instead of dynparts,
2) implement backup kernel and rootfs,
3) figure out if kboot / kexec buys us ANYTHING over what we already
have at that point so we should even bother thinking about it.
- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkhBaHEACgkQOjLpvpq7dMqlNQCfRuwdB1JN+8mxT04K2hB8vahe
ChUAnA4+OHbJE2KD1aX2FDaM+9K032nC
=qRvT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the openmoko-kernel
mailing list