[UPSTREAM] Attempt at improving ADC access
balajirrao at openmoko.org
Thu Oct 16 11:31:42 CEST 2008
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 06:31:47AM -0200, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Balaji Rao wrote:
> > Ah, now I remember! From the proposed sync callback, we wouldn't know
> > which completion to complete as we wouldn't be passed the adc_request
> > object. We could very well look at the queue head, but that would not be
> > a clean way to do it. What do you say ?
> How about passing the request ? Or a void pointer that's passed to
> the callback function, which then does with it whatever it wants,
> i.e., the usual
> ..., void (*fn)(void *arg), void *arg, ...
I tried this one as well but had dropped it in favour of a clean
But now I'm thinking it might be needed by async read functions as well
to store some kind of context. I'll go ahead and do this.
More information about the openmoko-kernel