[UPSTREAM] Attempt at improving ADC access

[Balaji Rao]

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:38:46AM +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> | On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:28:26AM +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> |> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> |> Hash: SHA1
> |>
> |> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> |> | Balaji Rao wrote:
> |> |> Sounds good. But in this case we still won't have an adc_request
> |> |> object within adc_sync_read to read the adc result from. And there
> is no
> |> |> other way we can get back the result. Isn't it ? :)
> |> |
> |> | Hmm, good point, the result ... you could pass a pointer to a suitable
> |> | struct instead of just the completion. Not sure if that would be much
> |> | nicer in the end, though.
> |> |
> |> | Ah well, it's pretty good already :-)
> |>
> |> Great... maybe send a last version on the list with the double-free
> |> fixed so I can commit it?
> |>
> | Andy, are you taking it into your tree ? I thought I'll maintain it on
> | balaj-tracking. Sorry, did I miss something ?
> |
> | (I've not pushed latest changes yet. I have to do a rebase on the latest
> | chages that have taken place in stable-tracking. I'll do it later
> | today.)
>
> Ah OK, I am travelling at the minute and just anxious not to let
> anything fall through the cracks.
>
ah, ok. I'll take care of it. Don't worry :)

> I'll keep and eye for balaji-tracking update then and rebase my stuff on it.

Sure. I'll update it soon.

	- Balaji