stable-tracking unification update

Balaji Rao balajirrao at
Sat Oct 25 09:57:01 CEST 2008

On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 08:34:52AM +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> Hi Balaji -
> |> patches on top of stable-tracking, but except for some small mystery
> |> about the recent i2c device api update breaking in mach_gta02.c (worked
> |> around), it seems OK at first glance.
> | I see that you have dumped andy-tracking into stable-tracking after
> removing
> | my patches - which is good. But I see some remains in mach-gta02.c coming
> | from cleanup-after-adding-andy-tracking-patchset.patch.
> Yes the intention is you can rebase balaji-tracking on this.
> | +	i2c_register_board_info(0, gta02_i2c_devs,
> | +						ARRAY_SIZE(gta02_i2c_devs));
> |
> |  	s3c2410_pm_init();
> |
> These are actually the workarounds I mentioned about I2C and PMU probing
> not working... I first tried the code same as after this patch, PMU
> probe was never called.  Only when I commented out the newish
> i2c_register_board_info and went back to explicitly registering the pmu
> device the old way could I get the PMU to be seen on boot.
> Did it work for you?  I didn't find out what the real problem is just
> worked around it and moved on.

I didn't try it by hoped that it would work. :) I'm building it now..

A quick check - Did you notice that I've removed pcf50633 from i2c_board_info
and added the wm8753 instead ? I don't understand why it would still interfere
with the PMU..

	- Balaji

More information about the openmoko-kernel mailing list