PLL & clock settings on GTA02: u-boot vs. qi

[scholbert]

Werner Almesberger wrote:
> 
> It would be great, yes. Alas, we found that, with Glamo and NOR sitting
> on the bus, the capacitative load is too largeto allow us to go much
> faster.
> 
> We once had a prototype without these two chips, and it hummed along
> happily at 133 MHz ...
> 
O.K. i see, so it's the load which harms the signals to much to be clean
enough for higher frequency...
So no real chance to boost the device without loosing stability, i guess.

Maybe hackers out there should shrink down complexity of the GUI to decrease
system load and increase response time of applications to make it feel
faster ;-)

Regards,

scholbert
-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/PLL---clock-settings-on-GTA02%3A-u-boot-vs.-qi-tp2274434p2276606.html
Sent from the Openmoko Kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.