FSO 2.6.28 usage report
andy at openmoko.com
Mon Jan 12 17:02:56 CET 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 03:33:56PM +0000, Andy Green wrote:
|> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|> Hash: SHA1
|> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
|> | On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
|> |>> I don't know if that's part of what he has to get straight for
|> |>> to be meaningful, but I am sure the quality and reliability of any
|> |>> figures it will give are going to be continue to be poor compared to
|> |>> GTA02 with HDQ smart battery where you can pretty much believe the
|> |>> capacity number completely, there's not a huge amount to be done
|> about it.
|> |> Sure, we can't expect things the hardware does not offer. Getting
|> what it offers
|> |> through th same interface as on GTA02 is fine for us.
|> | OK, pcf50633 does not offer a sysfs for battery voltage. But I think it
|> | can't be done away with for PCF50606..
|> Can we not make "battery" power_supply device and do it down there? I
|> think that's what's actually being looked for.
| Yes, that should be possible through platform data :) We can have a
| simple battery-class driver just to wrap stuff.. Will do that soon.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the openmoko-kernel