[ANDROID KERNEL PATCH 1/2] Prepare current kernel

[Michael Trimarchi]

Hi,

Andy Green wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> | Hi,
> |
> | Andy Green wrote:
> | Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> | | Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> | | | Prepare current kernel to support the new android layer
> | |
> | | |  kernel/power/power.h               |   31 +-
> | | |  kernel/power/process.c             |   28 +-
> | |
> | | Hi Michael -
> | |
> | | It seems we are missing some pre-patch on kernel/power/process.c,
> | | because the patch here does not apply on there (not due to 2.6.29-rc2
> | | uplevel either).
> |
> | Another issue seems to be stuff has moved into this new drivers/staging
> | place in 2.6.29.  There seems to be some android stuff in there already
> | (./drivers/staging/android) we will need to be compatible with.
> |
> | -Andy
> |>
> | As I suppose they move in a directory, so I just patch on that? I have
> | few diff.
>
> Yes if you can patch against the upstream state in
> ./drivers/staging/android I think it will be easier.
>
> If you can also make a patch to destroy our old tree in
> ./drivers/android cleanly that'd reduce confusion too.
>
> If we can keep everything in ./drivers/staging/android then I can diff
> that directory when I rebase from upstream and hopefully it won't be a
> big mess.
>
> - -Andy
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmAT2QACgkQOjLpvpq7dMoAuACePvPzSbFObL2cR3LIEd0E61lP
> fB0An1Upe9vvB1Zog7iUQpaqIs1oXVCM
> =bx9p
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Well,
I'm agree with you. I rebase all on the new directory. It is possible to 
create a
android-kernel branch in the openmoko?

Michael