[ANDROID KERNEL PATCH 1/2] Prepare current kernel

[Andy Green]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Hi,
|
| Andy Green wrote:
| Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| | Hi,
| |
| | Andy Green wrote:
| | Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| | | Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| | | | Prepare current kernel to support the new android layer
| | |
| | | |  kernel/power/power.h               |   31 +-
| | | |  kernel/power/process.c             |   28 +-
| | |
| | | Hi Michael -
| | |
| | | It seems we are missing some pre-patch on kernel/power/process.c,
| | | because the patch here does not apply on there (not due to 2.6.29-rc2
| | | uplevel either).
| |
| | Another issue seems to be stuff has moved into this new drivers/staging
| | place in 2.6.29.  There seems to be some android stuff in there already
| | (./drivers/staging/android) we will need to be compatible with.
| |
| | -Andy
| |>
| | As I suppose they move in a directory, so I just patch on that? I have
| | few diff.
|
| Yes if you can patch against the upstream state in
| ./drivers/staging/android I think it will be easier.
|
| If you can also make a patch to destroy our old tree in
| ./drivers/android cleanly that'd reduce confusion too.
|
| If we can keep everything in ./drivers/staging/android then I can diff
| that directory when I rebase from upstream and hopefully it won't be a
| big mess.
|
| -Andy
|>
| Well,
| I'm agree with you. I rebase all on the new directory. It is possible to
| create a
| android-kernel branch in the openmoko?

It's possible but why do we need it?  I can carry this in andy-tracking
directly.

- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmAUfEACgkQOjLpvpq7dMrkcwCeJ2In8PlCx6v2QQXJ9X20PH2D
Mu4AoIhIr7xvLUSv6O0lxLLCdmIR4J7e
=kUvt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----