Proposal for further openmoko kernel development
trimarchi at gandalf.sssup.it
Wed Jul 29 09:42:55 CEST 2009
Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> With the upcoming 2.6.31 kernel release basic support for the
>> freerunner as finally reached upstream.
>> What does this mean for the
>> community and distributions?
> Party !!! ;-)
>> Currently we have andy-tracking which is based on 2.6.29-rc3. And in
>> my opinion andy-tracking is in a very bad shape,
A git rebase is necessary and the android stuff can be moved on a
different branch or tree.
I can manage the change on that tree and follow the discussion around
>> several subtrees for each driver. On top of that would be two
>> machine trees and maybe one for s3c specific patches. The machine
>> specific trees would then regularly merge those driver trees they
> Hmm, this sounds like a lot of trees with a lot of merging going
> on between them.
I prefer one tree with the specific driver of the freerunnurer
>> Ideally all trees would be initially based on the upstream kernel.
> Sounds good. The closer we stay to upstream, the better.
More information about the openmoko-kernel