Proposal to send GSM sysfs patches on stable

Paul Fertser fercerpav at
Mon Mar 2 18:58:01 CET 2009

Andy Green <andy at> writes:
> | Andy Green wrote (ao):
> |> Otherwise, they will simply propose people keep using U-Boot and not Qi
> |> as their "fix". To the extent we pull some extra current until GSM is
> |> turned on, Qi is then compatible with old and new kernels. So it's the
> |> best path right now AFAICT.
> |
> | Would it be too inconvenient to have a 'correct' Qi and a
> | 'backwards compatible' Qi?
> It's not inconvenient if it can choose what to do at runtime, based on a
> sign from the U-Boot header that the kernel it's going to run can cope
> with the right thing.

Not compatible with zImage btw.

Andy, i'm sad to see how you want to spend time to introduce ugliness
that no distro maintainer seem to want.

Be free, use free ( software!
mailto:fercerpav at

More information about the openmoko-kernel mailing list