Collection of patches for om-gta02-2.6.34

Mark Brown broonie at
Thu Aug 26 14:59:04 CEST 2010

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 02:35:27PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:

> I agree that this workflow is not optimal. But as long as the official
> Debian kernel package is developed this way. It does not make things
> easier for pkg-fso to deviate from this scheme. The complete
> disconnection of the current pkg-fso kernel package
> (linux-image-2.6.29-openmoko) from the Debian kernel package is one
> reason why it has not been updated for a long time now.

> IMHO all kernel development should be done in the openmoko kernel git
> repository. 

As has already been pointed out in this thread the most direct way of
simplifying things here is probably to work to push the code directly

More information about the openmoko-kernel mailing list