Collection of patches for om-gta02-2.6.34
gaudenz at debian.org
Thu Aug 26 18:48:31 CEST 2010
Excerpts from Mark Brown's message of Don Aug 26 14:59:04 +0200 2010:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 02:35:27PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > I agree that this workflow is not optimal. But as long as the official
> > Debian kernel package is developed this way. It does not make things
> > easier for pkg-fso to deviate from this scheme. The complete
> > disconnection of the current pkg-fso kernel package
> > (linux-image-2.6.29-openmoko) from the Debian kernel package is one
> > reason why it has not been updated for a long time now.
> > IMHO all kernel development should be done in the openmoko kernel git
> > repository.
> As has already been pointed out in this thread the most direct way of
> simplifying things here is probably to work to push the code directly
I totally agree. I just wanted to propose the openmoko repository as a
short term staging ground instead of the completely unsuitable debian
packageing tree someone mentioned.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
~ Samuel Beckett ~
More information about the openmoko-kernel