State of upstreaming?
thib at sitedethib.com
Fri Sep 24 10:58:57 CEST 2010
Le mardi 21 septembre 2010 à 20:23 +0200, Radek Polak a écrit :
> I have been using 2.6.34 kernel for a few days in qtmoko distribution and i
> like how it works. If no serious regressions are found i would like to abandon
> 2.6.29 for qtmoko.
> But it would be nice to have more drivers upstream. It would be easier to
> track reggressions and i think open hardware phone deserves to be in upstream.
> Is anybody working on upstreaming now? Can i help somehow?
I was, but now, I'm really busy with various stuff.
I'll try to work a bit on it, though (I think I've a few patches waiting
to be pushed/mailed, I'll take care of that this evening).
Wolfgang Denk (who I've added to CC, just in case) was interested in
this too, and opened a git repo for this purpose.
If you want to do some kernel hacking, you can read Samuel's review
on the glamo-core patch and see how to address the remaining issues
(I'll post some patches to fix the cosmetic ones this evening).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/openmoko-kernel/attachments/20100924/71c8a976/attachment.pgp
More information about the openmoko-kernel