Is it really correct to set last_block_init to the next entry ?
It would seem that the current (i.e., bogus) values are then just
used without further ado. Untested.

Not-Yet-Signed-off-by: Werner Almesberger <werner@openmoko.org>

---

Index: qi/src/phase2.c
===================================================================
--- qi.orig/src/phase2.c	2009-01-08 23:27:41.000000000 -0200
+++ qi/src/phase2.c	2009-01-08 23:27:47.000000000 -0200
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
 		puts("block device init failed\n");
 		if (this_kernel->block_init != last_block_init)
 			indicate(UI_IND_MOUNT_FAIL);
-		last_block_init = this_kernel[1].block_init;
+		last_block_init = NULL;
 		return 0;
 	}
 	last_block_init = this_kernel->block_init;

--