"opkg upgrade" breaks USB networking: g_ether module missing

[Andy Green]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Somebody in the thread at some point said:
|>> ~ - binning the finegrained module packaging and having the modules
|>> all
|>> inside the kernel package
|>>
|> nope.
|>
|>> ~ - if not, making some modules dependencies of the kernel package
|>>
|> yes.
|>
|>> ~ - doing a depmod post-install or update of a kernel module package?
|>>
|> yes.
|
| i second that.

Opinions are interesting but frankly useless to me without some
explanation of why you came to think like that.  Sometimes people have
the wrong idea sometimes and it leads them to the wrong conclusion,
happens to me all the time anyway.  So please expand on "why".

- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiS8mYACgkQOjLpvpq7dMp6KACfXUTRAZWcvdXwfl4wbfa+1t38
OHsAnjtCC8yCVANwv2SnVSsSQxXT8zX9
=IZ4l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----