Om2009 testing Release 2

David Fokkema dfokkema at ileos.nl
Sat May 9 21:59:13 CEST 2009


On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 20:24 -0600, Angus Ainslie wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 21:17 +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
> > 
> > Right now, I'm thinking that _only_ fso got updated, and the
> > kernel/drivers are all the same. Alternatively, kernel drivers _were_
> > updated and those changes are reflected in both the fso images (it is a
> > rootfs with a /lib/modules/*, after all) and the stand-alone,
> > use-with-homegrown-rootfs modules file. Which one's correct?
> > 
> 
> fso, the feeds and the rootfs had some updates but most of the updates
> were to paroli. There have been kernel updates as well but there are a
> few bugs I don't want to bring in yet. To keep it stable I have opted to
> continue using an older kernel. This is not to minimize the work Nelson
> has been doing in the kernel, he will recommend a new kernel soon.

Ah, thanks for the answer! Now, of course, I'll flash release 3.

Regards,

David
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> support mailing list
> support at lists.openmoko.org
> https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support
> 




More information about the support mailing list