<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Rod Whitby <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rod@whitby.id.au">rod@whitby.id.au</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">sparky mat wrote:<br>
> I flashed the latest build (2008.8.11) from<br>
> <a href="http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/" target="_blank">http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/</a><br>
><br>
> USB networking is gone. Glamo doesn't seem to be installed by default<br>
> either. And, Om2008.8 doesn't update anything on 'opkg upgrade'.<br>
><br>
> So, how is this different (configuration wise) from the Om2008.8<br>
> release? Daily builds were behaving differently on and before the<br>
> Om2008.8 release, as well. So, if changes were made onto a different<br>
> branch for the 08.08.08 release, shouldn't it be merged into the trunk?<br>
<br>
</div></div>buildhost does not build Om2008.8 - it builds org.openmoko.dev which is<br>
completely different from org.openmoko.asu.testing (which is what I say<br>
it should build).<br>
<br>
See <a href="http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/1809" target="_blank">http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/1809</a> for details.<br>
<br>
As to why this situation is allowed to continue by Openmoko, is beyond<br>
my understanding.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>So does this mean I need to build for myself, the binaries, if I need the latest version of Om2008.8 ? <br></div>