<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/9/9 Gothnet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:openmoko@nastylittlehorse.net">openmoko@nastylittlehorse.net</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Would one of the two previous posters mind posting the results of hdparm -tT<br>
performed on your device for comparison?<br>
<br>
/dev/mmcblk0p2:<br>
Timing cached reads: 92 MB in 2.01 seconds = 45.66 MB/sec<br>
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl<br>
for device<br>
Timing buffered disk reads: 4 MB in 3.82 seconds = 1.05 MB/sec<br>
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl<br>
for device<br>
<br>
Which is not quite the 10/9 the blurb for the card cited. Not that I'm sure<br>
if the bottleneck is the freerunner or the card.</blockquote><div><br>The values for the Transcend TS8GUSDHC4:<br><br></div></div>/dev/mmcblk0p5:<br> Timing cached reads: 96 MB in 2.02 seconds = 47.64 MB/sec<br>HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device<br>
Timing buffered disk reads: 10 MB in 3.44 seconds = 2.91 MB/sec<br>HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device<br><br></div>