2009/1/9 Marcus Stong <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stongo@gmail.com">stongo@gmail.com</a>></span><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I'd just like to say, for all the whiners using om 2008.x (I've been one just recently, too), try FSO testing. I've been using it for a few days, and everything seems to work like a charm compared to OM2008.x.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Umh... it seems it's not so stable...I was missing for the last 3 weeks so perhaps I'm outdated on some informations ;)<br>However I installed the latest testing fso-image (14 jan), but it seems it has
no X server, on the download page it seems as that from 13 Jan the
image size is smaller than before. Is it something to be fixed or am I
missing sometingh?<br><br>
The image from 13 jan is not able to mount root device, and that from 8
jan on the first boot freezed on the illume initial setup.<br><br>
I always thinked FSO is an "hacker" image to develop and test the
framework, and that the FSO team is not focused on the pure image
stabilization, please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that now SHR
is actually the only alternative to Qtextended and 2008.12 to be used
both for production and for developing new applications in a quite
stable system environment ?<br>
<br>
Nicola<br>