Wifi again

[t3st3r]

Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Another, probably better, option is a bluetooth access point.
>   
Yes but it will have insignificant coverage. So it will be hardly 
limited to my home. Still something and better than nothing.
>   
>> P.S. As for me, I'm still do not understand, why there is no WI-FI built 
>> in. This is a BIG hardware design mistake IMHO. Linux without network is 
>> something like North Pole without snow. And the only somehow popular 
>> networking in public places is WI-FI.
>>     
>
> This has been discussed many, many times in the last month.  According
> to Sean, no wifi chips that both are low-power and have open specs.
>   
Hmm. Sorry for bothering once more then. Much more helpful reply 
compared to spam from David Schlesinger, thanks :)