USB 2.0 insted of USB 1.1

Sebastian Billaudelle sebbil at gmx.de
Sun Apr 6 23:59:01 CEST 2008


That's what I meant...

Am Sonntag, den 06.04.2008, 23:29 +0200 schrieb Flemming Richter
Mikkelsen:

> On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Sebastian Billaudelle <sebbil at gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> >  There is no such thing as an "USB 2.0 cable". It is called "USB
> > cable". There is no difference between a cable used for USB 1.0, 1.1
> > or 2.0.
> >
> >  Yes, there is! With USB 1.x you afaik can use longer cables! But normally
> > you are right. For normal use there is no difference!
> 
> That is only directly related to the transfer speed:)
> It is the same with TP cables and anything else. Lower speed - longer distance
> 
> 

Ich aktzeptiere keine MS Office Dokumente, weil sie
1. kein ISO Standard sind,
2. bewusst schlecht entwickelt sind und
3. nicht für alle zugänglich sind!

Benutze bitte das "Open Document Format" - jeder kann es kostenlos
öffnen - auch noch in tausenden von Jahren!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/attachments/20080406/6d4b1eb8/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/attachments/20080406/6d4b1eb8/attachment.pgp 


More information about the community mailing list