cpu-speed limitations
Alex Kavanagh
alex at ajkavanagh.co.uk
Tue Aug 5 18:33:04 CEST 2008
Aaron Sowry wrote, On 05/08/08 17:12:
>> Is the glamo graphics stuff the 'most important' thing that should be
>> done?
>>
> No, but I don't think it should be ignored. If there are a limited
> number of people with the authority/ability to do this then I think
> that's where their attention needs to be focused. 'Graphics stuff' might
> seem like polish but a smooth and responsive interface would totally
> transform the Freerunner as a palmtop device.
>
Very true. Having played with an iPhone3G the UI is very, very nice to
use and that's mostly about the performance of the graphics.
Personally, I do want the graphics stuff sorted - it'd be nice to see
*where* on the list of priorities it sits at OM. There aren't any
specific bugs in the trac about this (maybe there should be?)
>> i.e. in firmware on the glamo chip? The qtopia image (which uses
>> a framebuffer?) seems to get reasonably good performance without
>> anything extra.
>>
> It's reasonably good, but not great. You'd never get compositing without
> hardware acceleration (hey, I can dream can't I? ;) )
>
Me also :-)
--
Alex.
More information about the community
mailing list