SDHC 16GB 15MB/s card

[Cédric Berger]

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:50, arne anka <openmoko at ginguppin.de> wrote:
> by repartitioning -- but first you better post the output of
>
> fdisk -l /dev/mmcblk0
>
 result of fdisk -l /dev/mmcblk0  (from 2007.2 booted from NAND ):

"
root at om-gta02:~# fdisk -l /dev/mmcblk0

Disk /dev/mmcblk0: 8168 MB, 8168931328 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 993 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

        Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks  Id System
/dev/mmcblk0p1               1         536     4305388+  b Win95 FAT32
/dev/mmcblk0p2             863         993     1052257+ 83 Linux
/dev/mmcblk0p3             537         862     2618595   5 Extended
/dev/mmcblk0p5             537         601      522081  83 Linux
/dev/mmcblk0p6   *         602         666      522081  83 Linux
/dev/mmcblk0p7             667         731      522081  83 Linux
/dev/mmcblk0p8             732         796      522081  83 Linux
/dev/mmcblk0p9             797         862      530113+ 83 Linux

Partition table entries are not in disk order
"

Ok so my last partition is the second in partition table (mmcblk0p2).
Then the extended one containing the 5 logical is mmcblk0p3.

* can I change this table order without losing partition data ?
* can I have Extended partition number (mmcblk0p3 now) to be after the
logical ones  (so that mmcnlk0p2 and mmcblk0p3 refer to the 2 first
logical ones, -just the same as in my 512MB card-) ?

What is "funny" on my ubuntu laptop is that mount points are not
always in the same order. I have to be carefull !
(of course I can fix mount points once for all on my pc -and also
access rights for ext3-, but when I plug the card in another PC, I
have the problem back...)



On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:45, Cédric Berger <cedric.berger74 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:28, arne anka <openmoko at ginguppin.de> wrote:
>> no, it's not. but your description is rather confusting:
>> 1 primary fat
>> 5 extended ext3
>> 1 primary ext3
>>
>> i can't quite imagine how your partition table looks like.
>>
> 5 logical.
> Here I only have pc on windows : as seen on XP : (ext3 not recognized)
> http://cedricberger.free.fr/partitions.png
>