GTA01 Gllin ipkg

Dan Staley dlstal2 at uky.edu
Fri Feb 15 01:13:04 CET 2008


Hi everyone,
I recently got my GTA01 and am trying to get the gllin ipkg from
http://3rdparty.downloads.openmoko.org/gllin/ . However, everytime I
download it, it says it is corrupted.  Does anyone know another place I
can try to download it?

Thanks



On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 15:58 -0500, community-request at lists.openmoko.org
wrote:
> Send community mailing list submissions to
>         community at lists.openmoko.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         community-request at lists.openmoko.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         community-owner at lists.openmoko.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of community digest..."
> email message attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: fredthecat <fredthecat at blueyonder.co.uk>
> > Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > Subject: Exit of OpenMoko Window System
> > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:02:11 -0500
> > 
> > Dear All
> > 
> > I was playing around with a fully emulated QEMU OpenMoko system (from a
> > built system using MokoMakefile as
> > documented in the Wiki), and at one point I hit the space bar (it the
> > emulated Linux OpenMoko system received the
> > keypress).
> > 
> > When I did this, it exited the windows system (as if it had crashed or
> > just plain died), but dropped me to a command
> > line login ... and I could happily login as root and use regular commands.
> > 
> > My question is this:  did I hit a but and crash the UI, or did I hit
> > some magic (to me) sequence that is intended to exit the UI?
> > 
> > regards
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > 
> > 
> email message attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Ron K. Jeffries <rjeffries at gmail.com>
> > Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > To: community at lists.openmoko.org <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > Subject: LiMo article in Washington Post
> > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:46:57 -0500
> > 
> > Informative article about LiMO in the Washington Post:
> > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/14/AR2008021401518.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter
> > 
> > It may require site registration, but it is a very light-weight approach.
> > 
> > I am interested in understanding LimO and how it does or does not
> > relate to Open Moko.
> > 
> > thanks
> > --
> > Ron K. Jeffries
> > http://blog.eronj.com
> > 
> > 
> email message attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Robin Paulson <robin.paulson at gmail.com>
> > Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > Subject: Re: GTA02 Battery Capacity (Was: Re: More about the GTA02)
> > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:53:28 -0500
> > 
> > On 14/02/2008, Michael Shiloh <michael at openmoko.org> wrote:
> > > Thanks Kyle for a great summary of the work being discussed on the
> > >  kernel ML. I am simply not able to keep up with all the lists and very
> > >  much appreciate your helping out here.
> > >
> > >  Michael
> > 
> > indeed, thanks for the info kyle.
> > 
> > i've been avidly following the dev cycle of the software/hardware
> > here, and it's good to see some technical info from the kernel ML, 95%
> > of which is over my head
> > 
> > would it be possible for someone - michael, kyle? - to give an update
> > on this kind of info on a regular basis? i'm sure there are plenty of
> > others eager for technical progress, but who are unlikely to venture
> > on the kernel list?
> > 
> > 
> > >  Kyle Bassett wrote:
> > >  > I have been following the "Suspended Mode" thread in the kernel ML and
> > >  > they have made amazing progress within the last week.  As GTA02A5
> > >  > currently stands, a "cold" suspend mode (just GSM in standby awaiting
> > >  > incoming call/sms), could result in >20 days of standby!
> > >  >
> > >  > For those technical people on this list, they have gotten GTA02A5 in
> > >  > suspend using ~2.07mA @ 3.7v (fully charged batt).  If the GTA02 will
> > >  > have a 1200mAh battery, that's ~24 days of suspend runtime in a perfect
> > >  > world.  The goal is set around 1mA-2mA of suspend current draw, with
> > >  > best case scenario suspend time of ~50 days (sure beats 4 hours... :-P
> > >  > ).  There are also issues such as internal battery discharge, ~30% over
> > >  > 90 days for one of the packs that is being considered, which will reduce
> > >  > the final suspend runtime available.
> > >  >
> > >  > Currently, work continues attempting to shave even more power
> > >  > consumption from a sleeping Freerunner.  Individual power consumption of
> > >  > the different internal devices is still taking place, that way any user
> > >  > can approximate their battery lifetime (but each internal device has a
> > >  > few different states, making this a tedious task).  In the very near
> > >  > future, we should see some numbers coming in about the "talk" runtime,
> > >  > once some GSM power state issues are resolved.
> > >  >
> > >  > There is talk about pushing startup power control of the internal
> > >  > devices (wifi, bt, gps, mmc, etc.) to user level, as every user may or
> > >  > may not want certain devices available at bootup/all the time
> > >  > (availability vs. duration).
> > 
> > 
> email message attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: JW <jameswillmer at yahoo.com>
> > Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > To: community at lists.openmoko.org <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > Subject: topic for next community update [was Community Update Wed
> > Feb 13 2008]
> > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:10:27 -0500
> > 
> > Michael Shiloh <michael at ...> writes:
> > 
> > Hi Michael
> > 
> > Thanks for the update - here are some questions for the next one in a couple of
> > weeks .... all just to keep the community amused til the _great day_ arrives....
> > and not more important than the internal work of you and the OpenMoko team...
> > 
> > 1) General information about the Neo FreeRunner graphics capabilities.  This
> > follows some comments I saw by raster and others in the IRC channel that there
> > were some limiting issues.     What is the comparison to Neo1973 gfx?   This may
> > relate to what target market you are going after for FreeRunner.
> > 
> > 2) What is OpenMoko's plan to release FreeRunner
> > i) release when hardware and kernel are solid and before application software is
> > polished.   Community helps to polish software prior to full launch to "basic
> > end users"
> > ii) release when both hardware and software are polished.  Will take a little
> > longer but will impress journalists more...
> > 
> > 3) What does Sean think of the numbers here! :-)
> > http://openmoko.hobby-site.com/
> > 
> > JW
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> email message attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Marc-Olivier Barre <marco at marcochapeau.org>
> > Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > Subject: Re: topic for next community update [was Community Update
> > Wed Feb 13 2008]
> > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:25:00 -0500
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:10 PM, JW <jameswillmer at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Michael Shiloh <michael at ...> writes:
> > >
> > >  Hi Michael
> > >
> > >  Thanks for the update - here are some questions for the next one in a couple of
> > >  weeks .... all just to keep the community amused til the _great day_ arrives....
> > >  and not more important than the internal work of you and the OpenMoko team...
> > >
> > >  1) General information about the Neo FreeRunner graphics capabilities.  This
> > >  follows some comments I saw by raster and others in the IRC channel that there
> > >  were some limiting issues.     What is the comparison to Neo1973 gfx?   This may
> > >  relate to what target market you are going after for FreeRunner.
> > 
> > This might be of interest :
> > http://dodji.blogspot.com/2008/02/xglamo-x-server-of-neo-gta02-device.html
> > __________________
> > Marc-Olivier Barre,
> > MarcO'Chapeau.
> > 
> > 
> email message attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Steven ** <montgoss+openmokocommunity at gmail.com>
> > Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > Subject: Re: topic for next community update [was Community Update
> > Wed Feb 13 2008]
> > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:42:38 -0500
> > 
> > It's always been option i.  Hence the release of GTA01.  Many apps on
> > that are still not polished.
> > 
> > It'll be many months after the release of the Freerunner before the
> > phones are ready for "basic end users".
> > 
> > -Steven
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:10 PM, JW <jameswillmer at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >  2) What is OpenMoko's plan to release FreeRunner
> > >  i) release when hardware and kernel are solid and before application software is
> > >  polished.   Community helps to polish software prior to full launch to "basic
> > >  end users"
> > >  ii) release when both hardware and software are polished.  Will take a little
> > >  longer but will impress journalists more...
> > 
> > 
> email message attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Steven ** <montgoss+openmokocommunity at gmail.com>
> > Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > Subject: Re: LiMo article in Washington Post
> > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:55:12 -0500
> > 
> > The article says "Anyone hoping to create new applications for
> > competing proprietary programs from Microsoft Corp., Palm Inc.,
> > Research in Motion Ltd. or Nokia Corp.'s Symbian must pay licensing
> > fees."
> > So, I'd say it doesn't relate to OpenMoko.  OpenMoko is truly an open
> > platform that you can develop for without restrictions and without
> > paying anything.  "LiMo" seems to me to be some big companies grabbing
> > on to what they believe to be this great new buzz-word:  Linux.
> > 
> > -Steven
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ron K. Jeffries <rjeffries at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Informative article about LiMO in the Washington Post:
> > >  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/14/AR2008021401518.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter
> > >
> > >  It may require site registration, but it is a very light-weight approach.
> > >
> > >  I am interested in understanding LimO and how it does or does not
> > >  relate to Open Moko.
> > >
> > >  thanks
> > >  --
> > >  Ron K. Jeffries
> > >  http://blog.eronj.com
> > >
> > >  _______________________________________________
> > >  OpenMoko community mailing list
> > >  community at lists.openmoko.org
> > >  http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
> > >
> > 
> > 
> email message attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Ortwin Regel <ortwin at gmail.com>
> > Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
> > <community at lists.openmoko.org>
> > Subject: Re: GTA02 Battery Capacity (Was: Re: More about the GTA02)
> > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:58:07 -0500
> > 
> > Can GTA01 users upgrade to this battery and would it make sense to do so?
> > 
> > Ortwin
> > 
> > On 2/14/08, Wolfgang Spraul <wolfgang at openmoko.com> wrote:
> > > Andy -
> > >
> > > > class to expose it so it is generic. (I don't know for sure if it
> > > > will
> > > > ship with such a battery since it is decided in .tw according to
> > > > availability and so on, but I hope it will.)
> > >
> > > Yes, I think we can confirm that every GTA02 will ship with this new
> > > 'smart' battery.
> > > There are more steps to go through internally, related to
> > > certification, some sort of calibration. Tony, do you know more details?
> > > The cell's capacity will increase slightly to 1250 mAh (before was
> > > 1200 mAh).
> > > I am trying to release the schematics for the small PCB inside the
> > > smart battery as well, will be posted to the wiki.
> > >
> > > Wolfgang
> > >
> > > On Feb 15, 2008, at 12:43 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> > >
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > >
> > > > Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> > > >> On Thursday, Feb 14, 2008, "Kyle Bassett" writes:
> > > >>> There is talk about pushing startup power control of the internal
> > > >>> devices
> > > >>> (wifi, bt, gps, mmc, etc.) to user level, as every user may or may
> > > >>> not want
> > > >>> certain devices available at bootup/all the time (availability vs.
> > > >>> duration).
> > > >>
> > > >> Indeed, this along with good realtime stats on power usage and
> > > >> current
> > > >> battery level would let people have reasonably accurate predictions
> > > >> of
> > > >> their battery life. It'd be interesting (to me at least) to turn
> > > >> on and off the various peripherals and watch my projected battery
> > > >> life
> > > >> go up and down accordingly.
> > > >
> > > > GTA02 is capable to dialogue with a "smart battery" that will allow
> > > > you
> > > > to see the battery actual voltage and current flow (together: actual
> > > > power) in uA down /sys in realtime, it uses the linux "Power Supply"
> > > > class to expose it so it is generic. (I don't know for sure if it
> > > > will
> > > > ship with such a battery since it is decided in .tw according to
> > > > availability and so on, but I hope it will.)
> > > >
> > > > The battery itself learns its cell performance over load and also
> > > > makes
> > > > available its "time to full/empty" estimate down /sys as well in
> > > > seconds. You can see what data is available here:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/bq27000
> > > >
> > > > You can see stuff like this
> > > >
> > > > for i in capacity charge_full current_now present status technology
> > > > temp
> > > > time_to_empty_now time_to_full_now type voltage_now ; do echo -n "$i
> > > > " ; cat /sys/devices/platform/bq27000-battery.0/power_supply/bat/
> > > > $i ; done
> > > >
> > > > capacity 0
> > > > charge_full 1215585
> > > > current_now 183375
> > > > present 1
> > > > status Discharging
> > > > technology Li-ion
> > > > temp 276
> > > > time_to_empty_now 0
> > > > time_to_full_now 3932100
> > > > type Battery
> > > > voltage_now 2761000
> > > >
> > > > - -Andy
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> > > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> > > >
> > > > iD8DBQFHtG+yOjLpvpq7dMoRAq2TAJoCYOC+PD3gj/jRMpOPnBL5MZJkzQCfTJn4
> > > > 9ebCrbNjtGtDMBsJuUXZ8HY=
> > > > =ANtG
> > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > OpenMoko community mailing list
> > > > community at lists.openmoko.org
> > > > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenMoko community mailing list
> > > community at lists.openmoko.org
> > > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
> > >
> > 
> > 





More information about the community mailing list