OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))
Crane, Matthew
mcrane03 at harris.com
Wed May 7 20:48:04 CEST 2008
Ouch.. Kdevelop is a great way to quickly get an autotooled project
going, work with a shell, doxygen, cvs, gdb. Yea, it may have a few
more stability issues then even eclipse.
I mean, if you are expecting perfection, open-source tools just aren't
going to appeal. I guess Netbeans was comercially developed and may
have a bit more robustness, but lacks the open integration of eclipse
and kdev?
Visual Studio is terrible, I agree with that.
-----Original Message-----
From: community-bounces at lists.openmoko.org
[mailto:community-bounces at lists.openmoko.org] On Behalf Of Lally Singh
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 1:57 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))
You're welcome to do so :-)
I use NB for development for my day job & the PhD. I also have no
respect for KDevelop. I think it's almost as terrible as Visual
Studio.
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen
<admin at leinir.dk> wrote:
> Hmm... KDevelop 4? (it's being reimplemented and is looking
super-nifty by
> now) :)
>
> Wednesday 07 May 2008 skrev Lally Singh:
>
>
> > Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already
> > have a basic ARM target for ghc, and there's already a haskell->GTK
> > mapping.
> >
> > But, now that we're talking about development environments, who'd
be
> > interested in using an IDE for developing OM?
> >
> > I was thinking about putting together a Netbeans plugin to dev for
it.
> > I'm wondering:
> > 1. anyone want to use such a thing?
> > 2. anyone wanna help?
> >
> > I'll be using Mac OS X & solaris personally (probably more of the
> > latter), but if someone'd be up for testing it on Linux, I'd be
happy
> > to support that too. A nice little basis to create wizards for all
> > kinds of OM applications, plugins, etc. sounds like good community
> > open-source fun.
> >
> > I'd consider this my first big contribution to OM, so I'm happy to
do it.
> >
> > Please, no religious wars on Java/NetBeans, etc. Feel free to use
the
> > work for your own desires after, but I've been through enough dev
> > cycles on other platforms that I'm feeling pretty firm on this.
> >
> > If you say 'Eclipse', I'm going to traceroute you from a cell modem
in
> > my car, and bring a baseball bat with me.
> >
> > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Oliver Uvman
<oliver.uvman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Jesus! I thought I was the only one wanting to program CL on the
OM.
> > > I've had lots of interesting ideas on how to use a gesture-based
> > > interface for writing CL, which could work only thanks to the
sparse
> > > syntax, and plan to make that some of the first things I program
for
> > > my OM. Hooray!
> > >
> > > /Oliver Uvman
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openmoko community mailing list
> > > community at lists.openmoko.org
> > > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
>
>
> --
> ..Dan // Leinir..
> http://www.leinir.dk/
>
> Co-
> existence
> or no
> existence
>
> - Piet Hein
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
--
H. Lally Singh
Ph.D. Candidate, Computer Science
Virginia Tech
_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community at lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
More information about the community
mailing list