OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

Crane, Matthew mcrane03 at harris.com
Wed May 7 20:48:04 CEST 2008


Ouch..  Kdevelop is a great way to quickly get an autotooled project
going, work with a shell, doxygen, cvs, gdb.  Yea, it may have a few
more stability issues then even eclipse. 

I mean, if you are expecting perfection, open-source tools just aren't
going to appeal.  I guess Netbeans was comercially developed and may
have a bit more robustness, but lacks the open integration of eclipse
and kdev?

Visual Studio is terrible, I agree with that. 

-----Original Message-----
From: community-bounces at lists.openmoko.org
[mailto:community-bounces at lists.openmoko.org] On Behalf Of Lally Singh
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 1:57 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))


You're welcome to do so :-)

I use NB for development for my day job & the PhD.  I also have no
respect for KDevelop.  I think it's almost as terrible as Visual
Studio.


On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen
<admin at leinir.dk> wrote:
> Hmm... KDevelop 4? (it's being reimplemented and is looking
super-nifty by
>  now) :)
>
>  Wednesday 07 May 2008 skrev Lally Singh:
>
>
> > Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM.  They already
>  > have a basic ARM target for ghc, and there's already a haskell->GTK
>  > mapping.
>  >
>  > But, now that we're talking about development environments,  who'd
be
>  > interested in using an IDE for developing OM?
>  >
>  > I was thinking about putting together a Netbeans plugin to dev for
it.
>  >  I'm wondering:
>  > 1. anyone want to use such a thing?
>  > 2. anyone wanna help?
>  >
>  > I'll be using Mac OS X & solaris personally (probably more of the
>  > latter), but if someone'd be up for testing it on Linux, I'd be
happy
>  > to support that too.  A nice little basis to create wizards for all
>  > kinds of OM applications, plugins, etc. sounds like good community
>  > open-source fun.
>  >
>  > I'd consider this my first big contribution to OM, so I'm happy to
do it.
>  >
>  > Please, no religious wars on Java/NetBeans, etc.  Feel free to use
the
>  > work for your own desires after, but I've been through enough dev
>  > cycles on other platforms that I'm feeling pretty firm on this.
>  >
>  > If you say 'Eclipse', I'm going to traceroute you from a cell modem
in
>  > my car, and bring a baseball bat with me.
>  >
>  > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Oliver Uvman
<oliver.uvman at gmail.com>
>  wrote:
>  > > Jesus! I thought I was the only one wanting to program CL on the
OM.
>  > >  I've had lots of interesting ideas on how to use a gesture-based
>  > >  interface for writing CL, which could work only thanks to the
sparse
>  > >  syntax, and plan to make that some of the first things I program
for
>  > >  my OM. Hooray!
>  > >
>  > >  /Oliver Uvman
>  > >
>  > >  _______________________________________________
>  > >  Openmoko community mailing list
>  > >  community at lists.openmoko.org
>  > >  http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
>
>
>  --
>  ..Dan // Leinir..
>  http://www.leinir.dk/
>
>                           Co-
>                             existence
>                           or no
>                             existence
>
>                           - Piet Hein
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Openmoko community mailing list
>  community at lists.openmoko.org
>  http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>



-- 
H. Lally Singh
Ph.D. Candidate, Computer Science
Virginia Tech

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community at lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community




More information about the community mailing list