cellhunter --- the state of development and future

[vale]

why do we need so many databases doing the same?

cellhunter has far more cells than openbmap, so why not just bundle the
effort and only have one database for getting cells with openmoko?

greetings

vale

i think cellhunter has far more

Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> 
> [Resend as the ml seems not to like my other email address, but do not
> inform me
> about this either...]
> 
> Hello.
> 
> On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 15:58, Sebastian Hammerl wrote:
>> 
>> So here is the call to all the developers around to create a location
>> service based on the opencellid data. for me that database should be the
>> main db and everyone can provide his data to this db.
> 
> As long as I don't get an answer from Thomas about his willingness to add
> informations about cell quality and other data then cell IDs, like wifi
> APs,
> into the opencellid db FSO will not go into the opencellid direction at
> all.
> 
> Telling people all the time that it is the biggest db and don't answer
> requests
> about quality and other data buys you nothing guys.
> 
> We will think more about this until and at FSOSHRUDCON, but we will not go
> with
> opencellid just because they have the most data yet.
> 
> regards
> Stefan Schmidt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/cellhunter-----the-state-of-development-and-future-tp2657164p2663178.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.