Fundamental Qi question

[Marcel]

Am Montag, 1. Juni 2009 14:32:26 schrieb Paul Fertser:
> "Maksim 'max_posedon' Melnikau" <maxposedon at gmail.com> writes:
> >> My MUA is flexible enough to strip _forged_ Reply-To header that
> >> this list errorneously adds to every mail. So i'm perfectly aware
> >> how this fucking mailing list works and i had to explicitly
> >> workaround this stupidity.
> >
> > You still putting arne anka, in TO: and list in CC:,
> >
> > I agree with arne anka, that you should send mails(and reply-s) only
> > TO: list.
>
> I said i did the wrong thing only once as a courtesy to arne. I won't
> do it again because it's plain wrong. If you don't want to find the
> proof yourself i will do that for you later. But i think you know me
> enough to understand that if i do it that way i have a good enough
> reason to do so. And if you look at any other sane ML out there (LAKML
> e.g.) you'll see everybody doing the same.

I have often enough seen people on debian-user-german that actually 
*don't* want to be CCed because they read the list and therefore don't 
need a dedicated reply.

--
Marcel