a new keyboard - discuss and critique

[Steve Mosher]

before you test you need a good theory. that way you know what data to 
collect. raster has a theory why it wont be better. That's a testable 
theory, I think.

Michal Brzozowski wrote:
> 2009/6/3 Carsten Haitzler <raster at rasterman.com>
> 
>> but u'll hit dead space (nothing) about 50% more often than the actual key
>> you
>> intended to hit now (as 50% of the area it would have normally used is now
>> dead
>> space). for a physical kbd it might help as u have better tactile feel as u
>> have
>> more edge near the finger, but for a touchscreen - all you do is lose 50%
>> of he
>> area you had before for hitting keys. (admittedly  for mis-types now where
>> you
>> would have hit another key there is less area to hit too).
>>
>> so you lose more keypresses (you lost 50% of the hit area), but you lost
>> mis-hit
>> area too.
>>
>> one way or another - you press, then quickly press next key, but then
>> notice
>> that the previous key wasn't hit - u still need to backspace and re-enter
>> again
>> (possibly missing again). you just give up 1 kind of error for another kind
>>
> 
> I'm amazed how much you guys can theorize about the idea before actually
> trying it.
> 
> Is it because of allergy to patents? I bet we could use the general idea if
> we wanted to, without violating the patent. Just change the shape of the
> keys or something.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community