[Announce] Intel and Nokia announce open source telephony

[Pander]

Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 May 2009 00:17:26 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:52:48AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 May 2009 16:40:48 +0200 Pander <pander at users.sourceforge.net> 
> said:
>>>> Steve 'dillo Okay (Roadknight Mobility Labs) wrote:
>>>>> On May 11, 2009, at 13:26 , community-request at lists.openmoko.org 
> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez
>>>>>> <david at tuxbrain.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big
>>>>>> guys, but which hardware?, I haven't see any reference on that in
>>>>>> the web site. any clue any one?
>>>>> "OpenNoko" anyone ? :)
>>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>> Why don't they adapt what is already out there... Otherwise it would be
>>>> OpenNono
>>> the simple version it seems is that they simply don't like fso's api.
>>> marcel holtmann said its too low-level and they don't see it as something
>>> they want. ask them for more details - but tat seems to be the gist of
>>> it.
>> I'm a layman but that seems bonkers if that's their "official" argument...
>> they could always add a layer above it :(
> 
> Besides that a) it really isn't too low level -- it's rather an appropriate 
> compromise between the 3GPP specs and what applications want to know -- and b) 
> there's an even higher level already available in FSO called ophone.

Perhaps they are aiming at this high level API:

   void do_it(void);

> 
> :M:
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community