Some questions about android on Freerunner

Shaz shazalive at gmail.com
Fri Nov 6 08:32:10 CET 2009


On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Paul Fertser <fercerpav at gmail.com> wrote:

> a dehqan <dehqan65 at gmail.com> writes:
> > 3 - Problem is that : our religion Eslam says you can use a person
> > code while he/she allows you , now There are codes and wiki and
> > .. on Google host .Even google is not owner of codes , Host pertains
> > to google . So using that address and host is not possible for
> > moslems now .
>
> I can't exactly follow the logic. You said google doesn't want you to
> use their site. In fact i doubt that's true. They don't care if you
> use their site or not; they implemented that "restriction" solely to
> make some US jerks happy and to not have any problems with their
> inappropriate legislation. Also you should note that google is not a
> person, it's a large corporation functioning in a complex
> international environment. So even if they say they're prohibiting
> something it doesn't mean they actually do (and in fact they can't)
> and/or want it.
>
> I hope someone more skilled in Islam than me can clarify this matter
> from a religious POV but judging on common grounds it's perfectly
> moral to circumvent an artificial restriction especially given that
> restricting anybody is not intended.
>

In simple words Google cannot give you something directly and you have to
get it through the third party because the first party wants to give it to
you while an *influential* body above google is just creating hurdles due to
its own interests. So I guess there is no moral issue to get it through a
third party and Google has no benefit in restricting it, infact it is going
against their interest considering the matter at hand.

-- 
Shaz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/attachments/20091106/9cf67d2c/attachment.htm 


More information about the community mailing list