1024#

[Joan.doe at gmx.net]

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 14:27:44 -0500
Mikhail Umorin <mikeumo at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Friday 09 October 2009 06:42:11 Joan.doe at gmx.net wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 00:31:43 +0100
> >
> > Stroller <stroller at stellar.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
> > > On 8 Oct 2009, at 22:15, Mikhail Umorin wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 08 October 2009 11:57:38 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> > > >> either you are in a zone with weak signal from 4508 and 2DF1 (so you
> > > >> jump frequently from one to the other) or yes, you probably are
> > > >> suffering
> > > >> from #1024 :(
> > > >
> > > > What's the best way to differentiate? Stand by a cell tower and wait
> > > > for a
> > > > couple of hours?
> > >
> > > It has already been posted here:
> > >
> > >     Under normal circumstances you would only see these messages with a
> > >     change of cell, so cid would be different. The only time I know of
> > >     that you might legitimately see repeated reconnection to the same
> > > cell
> > >     is if you've got very low signal and it's the only cell visible.
> > >
> > > I am really unclear why you feel the need to ask - yet again - if
> > > you're affected by #1024, when all the symptoms so clearly seem to
> > > point to it.
> > >
> > > Your Freerunner is of one of the batches affected, yes?
> > >
> > > Your Freerunner is reregistering. Obviously.
> > >
> > > Do you really have reason to believe you're in an area which receives
> > > poor coverage from these two towers? What signal strength do mobile
> > > phones generally show in your house? Or are you just grasping at
> > > straws, hoping your Freerunner is unaffected?
> > >
> > > Stroller.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openmoko community mailing list
> > > community at lists.openmoko.org
> > > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
> >
> > Am i the only one who sees 3 towers?
> >
> 
> 
> if you are referring to my log, there are actually 8 towers: 2DF1, 2CED, 4508, 
> 4506, 4507, 2B20, 2B21, and 2B04
> 
> What's up with that?
> 

Sorry pedantic post, like to withdraw the previous post.