QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko v33)

[zyth at onego.ru]

 Agree with Gennady. Look what happened to SHR!
 It is also necessary to fix rndis & usb-host )

 On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:48:28 +0300, Gennady Kupava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope there is still some chances that Radek will change his 
> dicision.
>
> From my point of view where is no real need in FSO/qt gibrid, because 
> of
> following reasons:
>
> 1. qt stack has richer functionalily, better performance, and less 
> bugs
> than that FSO dbus/vala thing (don't throw rotten tomatoes to me 
> plese)
> 2. qt has it's own resource management, FSO - it's own, rewriting qt 
> one
> to FSO one is worthless effort
> 3. where logs of significantly more useful, easier and 
> non-destructive
> goals to rich, i can suggest few:
> 3.1 switch back to X11. with new graphical subsystem performance this
> will work great.
> 3.2 switch to newer qt versions
> 3.3 fix 100500 bugs left
> 3.4 add gta04 support <- most important
> 3.5 improve performance and usability
> 3.6 implement new features, like: 'geek' theme, sliding buttons in
> answer screen
>
> ^^^ IMO this set can keep everyone busy for a while.
>
> where is also no real benefit visible from switching to FSO. qtmoko 
> will
> become more complicated, more buggy, slower, harder to develop :(
>
> I afraid i'll have to stay on non-FSO version forether. And certain,
> this planned change worth more discussion. If someone wants FSO, 
> better
> to install it on debian or with SHR.
>
> Gennady.
>
> В Втр, 08/03/2011 в 18:00 +0100, Radek Polak пишет:
>> Dmitry Chistikov wrote:
>>
>> > I'm afraid it's too early to ask, but could you give an estimate 
>> on how
>> > much time it'll take to enable the use of FSO framework? Just 
>> something
>> > like "about a year" or, say, "not less than four months".
>>
>> Writing simple dialer application could be matter of days/hours. 
>> Integrating
>> all the functions so that it looks like qtmoko now will be much more 
>> difficult
>> (i cant even guess how much). We also need FSO running on debian - 
>> i'd prefer
>> current git version. I am not aware if there are debian packages for 
>> recent
>> FSO. Anyone knows?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Radek
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openmoko community mailing list
>> community at lists.openmoko.org
>> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community