fernando at cmartins.nl
Tue Aug 29 09:06:29 UTC 2017
I think it is good that you warn people about the illegality of the situation.
I don't think it is good you claim the high ground of morals. According to your definition of right, the status of society would never change. Yes, one could do the legal fights to change the law, I guess. Good luck with that.
You appear to disregard that society has changed mostly with revolutions, fights for workers rights, etc, to arrive to a better world from which you probably benefit. And there is clearly room for improvement for a better society.
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." George Bernard Shaw <http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/George_Bernard_Shaw/>,
Having said that, I find the physical threats out of proportion for the intended benefit. Not to mention counterproductive.
On August 29, 2017 at 10:14:57 am +02:00, joerg Reisenweber <joerg at openmoko.org> wrote:
> On Mon 28 August 2017 22:33:03 Mychaela Falconia wrote:
> > > thus rendering any operation of the device outside controlled self-
> > > contained lab environment illegal.
> > >
> > Yup, just like using hormonal birth control from an overseas pharmacy
> > without allowing a doctor to sexually violate you under the guise of a
> > necessary exam. Laws like that are MEANT to be broken.
> Thanks for taking care to lure users into breaking laws that need to get
> broken according to your definition. Just, I don't need any help on that, I
> need clear information about what I into when I follow your advice.
> Can't you see how you're acting wrong?
> Openmoko community mailing list
> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the community