ipkg vs. opkg

[Andy Green]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Somebody in the thread at some point said:

|> i think you're mistaken ipkg is licensed under the gpl
|
| The name IPKG is trademarked, which has nothing to do with the gpl
licensing. and no, I am not mistaken.
| http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=77123575

Then since I can't imagine anyone wanting to pay to license this, or
even go begging, this question is surely resolved in favour of changing
the name.

- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiReKEACgkQOjLpvpq7dMogJgCcDdDbDt8kYL7jPtDR9XQK384+
KqEAn0sUi1mFTUJnuIo0EzR3Qy42K4do
=wMMK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----