e-libs version numbering

Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann mok at mnet-online.de
Wed Jun 24 12:31:42 CEST 2009


Am Mittwoch 24 Juni 2009 12:09:36 schrieb Michal Brzozowski:
> 2009/6/24 Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann <mok at mnet-online.de>
>
> > Am Mittwoch 24 Juni 2009 10:37:39 schrieb Michal Brzozowski:
> > > 2009/6/24 Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann <mok at mnet-online.de>
> > >
> > > > Right now SHR is using a newer version of enlightenment as OM is
> > > > using. That's
> > > > where the difference comes from. And this game will continue until
> > > > enlightenment people decide otherwise :(
> > >
> > > Isn't it possible for OM and SHR to agree on one version of
> > > enlightenment that they would find most stable and use it for a while?
> > > Do you really
> >
> > need
> >
> > > the bleeding edge? It's not only about app development. Enlightenment
> >
> > The big difference is that OM is trying to stabilize to get the release
> > out.
> > And we're doing something *unstable* where we want to get the newest
> > recommended (by enlightenment upstream) version of E. And yes, it has
> > stuff we
> > actually need.
> >
> > > crashes all the time in both SHR unstable and OM testing (or is it just
> >
> > me
> >
> > > experiencing this?).
> >
> > E does not crash for me. The only thing that made E crash in the past was
> > playing with the topbar gadgets for me. Did not try that with the current
> > one
> > though.
>
> It did a week or two ago (the last time I tried SHR-U). The same symptoms
> as I have in current Om testing: when using the fullscreen option in
> tangogps and woosh, or touching the top panel in woosh.
I don't have woosh installed... but I tried fullscreen in tangogps and that 
does not crash... at least on a short try.
>
> You have a point there about it being *unstable*, so don't take it as
> complaint :-)
:)

-- 

Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann



More information about the devel mailing list