Dead Pixels [resolved]

Thomas Gstädtner thomas at gstaedtner.net
Mon Oct 15 11:16:27 CEST 2007


That's what I expected.
Afaik there is a class 1 which allows not a single dead pixel, too - but it
should be hard to get and expensive I guess.
Well, 2 pixels of 300.000 is OK imho and I simply was not as lucky as you.
:)
Thanks for the info and let's hope that I will stay the only one with a dead
pixel.


2007/10/14, Harald Welte <laforge at openmoko.org>:
>
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:50:06PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:30:42PM +0200, Thomas Gstädtner wrote:
> >
> > > There's only one thing I don't like: I have a dead pixel (or 2 dead
> > > subpixels) :(
> > > Its light, green and it sucks on dark backgrounds. But well, it's only
> 1 of
> > > 300,000 pixels and hardly to see on lighter or coloured bachgrounds,
> so I
> > > can live with it.
> > > Anyone else with dead pixels or am I the only one?
> >
> > I have not seen any unit with dead pixels so far.
>
> I've apparently just been lucky [or blind].
>
> According to the quality specification, the display can have up to two
> pixels defective like you have described and still be within spec.
>
> Sorry about that.  But I guess that's just industry standard,  and since
> we have four times the pixels of most 2.8" displays, the probability of
> bad ones is higher, too :(
>
> Cheers,
> --
> - Harald Welte <laforge at openmoko.org>
> http://openmoko.org/
>
> ============================================================================
> Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/device-owners/attachments/20071015/e531d761/attachment.html


More information about the device-owners mailing list