Qtopia Phone Licensing Issue
wolfgang at openmoko.com
Tue Apr 1 15:47:00 CEST 2008
please provide exact information for the libamr license. If it is
'unknown', it may be 'in the public domain'.
For openssl, we should add GnuTLS support.
Honestly I think both cases do not sound very dramatic to me.
But it's great you keep a watchful eye and help us do the due
On Apr 1, 2008, at 9:36 PM, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> Well it looks like no-one did due diligence on the qtopia licenses
> and I
> think in fact Openmoko cannot distribute the result of a qtopia build.
> Ive just done a quick check on qtopia source and so far have found two
> licensing problems.
> 1) libamr, listed as FREEWARE in source, seems to be the libamr
> distributed by the 3gpp group with an unknown license. A google search
> for other projects using this library seems to indicate the general
> consensus that it is not GPL compatible.
> 2) openssl, although it is Ok for qtopia to link against openssl. It
> not Ok for the stuff in src/3rdparty to be forced to link against
> openssl without license clauses to this effect.
> I think until this licensing issue is cleaned up that we cannot
> distribute any qtopia-phone images.
> Especially as Harald used to be our leader.
More information about the distro-devel