[gta02-core] KiCad wish list
werner at openmoko.org
Mon Jun 15 16:43:22 CEST 2009
?lvaro Lopes wrote:
> This symbol does not have pin numbers associated with each pin,
> but only pin names. The device includes mapping between symbol pins
> and package pins (not necessarly 1-to-1).
KiCad lets you do about half of this: I think you should be able to
define pin "numbers" by name in both the component and the footprint.
However, then you'd get a function-specific footprint (e.g., a
SOT-323 for BJTs with pads labeled B, C, E), which isn't so nice.
Having KiCad know about a mapping (if one exists) is an interesting
idea. That would also allow you to show the real pin/pad numbers in
the schematics, while keeping the symbolic pin "numbers" inside.
(In fact, maybe just do away with the pin numbers, and use the pin
names as a key for the map. That would remove one level of
> What I'd really like is to abstract even more, like to have a symbol
> (design), an intermediate device (how symbol maps to functionality)
> and a real device (how functionality maps to pins).
Ah yes, that could be nice. E.g., to combine nearby individual
resistors into an array and such, without messing up the
More information about the gta02-core