andy at openmoko.com
Fri Aug 29 13:02:12 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
|> Still one part of what Joerg has been talking about he characterized as
|> different component selection so it was more robust, that sounds fine if
|> it is not adding expense / size.
| Though you were bitching at it from very beginning, and it never would
This is the second time we have a thread where you are seem to me to be
basically sulking you are not getting automatic signoff on what you want
to apply to the hardware design. Isn't once enough on internal list?
I made my points about it, if you have some analysis of dead GTA02s to
drive this then I am listening. If someone in .tw is already convinced
by your use of "bitching" repeatedly, they can just take it on by their
own decision. But of all the crap we have to worry about on GTA03...
making up new worries like polarity reversal protection...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the hardware