AT%SLEEP=n power consumption
"Marco Trevisan (Treviño)"
mail at 3v1n0.net
Tue Oct 21 00:59:31 CEST 2008
Alastair Johnson wrote:
> I thought the idea was to make GSM usable for people suffering from
> #1024 :-) Mickey suggests the bandaid may make power consumption worse
> in comment 45.
>
> I may have missed something, but I haven't seen any hard evidence on the
> effect of #1024 on power consumption. Werner's results show the
> difference between SLEEP=4 and SLEEP=2 for a phone without #1024.
Well my phone doesn't seem to suffer of that bug, but using a the
SLEEP=2 mode it seems to consume a lot also in suspend state.
I've not been able to get again 2 days of usage without recharging.
--
Treviño's World - Life and Linux
http://www.3v1n0.net/
More information about the hardware
mailing list