Power leakage: save 40mW by turning GSM on
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
rask at sygehus.dk
Sun Feb 22 19:44:58 CET 2009
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:50:59AM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> > Given that power consumption was basicly the same 8,32 mW before and after
> > the AT at POFF command, what exactly is that command supposed to do?
>
> That's funny, though.
No, it's not, because I posted under my real name. The first two major
blunders in that posting are:
1) Not setting the serial port speed.
2) Not waking up the modem from deep sleep before sending AT at POFF.
For lack of a brown paper hat, I'm wearing the box that my Neo shipped
in.
Today, trying to hunt down a 13.8 mA current leak directly from the
battery, I cursed mickeyterm, echo, serial ports and modems in general
several times for sending every other command to a blackhole instead of to
the AT command interpreter. But in the end, I realized that the modem powers
up with deep sleep enabled, so after a few seconds of AT command inactivity,
it will go to sleep and not see the next command sent.
[AT at POFF]
> It tells the PMU of the GSM subsystem to
> shut down, similar to how we power off the main system (PMU state
> "Standby", not to be confused with CPU suspend.)
In particular, is it supposed to undo the effects of AT+CFUN=1 (which
will turn on receiver, transmitter and everything else needed for full
GSM functionality)?
--
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
Danish law requires addresses in e-mail to be logged and stored for a year
More information about the hardware
mailing list