Power management concept...
nils.faerber at kernelconcepts.de
Tue Apr 24 14:33:07 CEST 2007
Ian Stirling schrieb:
> Nils Faerber wrote:
>> Personally I would be much more interested in slow-mode than in
>> suspend/power-off. As I described it would allow (slow) applications
>> running all the time without much power consumption. This would be a
>> very interesting feature.
> Annoying things about slow mode.
> Uses several (3-5) times more power per MIP than fast mode.
> USB does not work, so no bluetooth.
> LCD controller does not work, so no display (unless as I've speculated,
> the LCD - as some can, can be written from the SPI bus).
> CPU alone in slow mode uses some 1/3 of the battery per day.
Oh, that's not good.
I hoped for something like the Nokia devices.
> Things that are possible - GPS, GSM, audio in/out (though there is not
> enough CPU to decode OGG/MP3/...).
And touchscreen I guess.
> It may well in many applications be better to - if it can be done
> rapidly - suspend to RAM for 5 seconds and wakeup for 1 second, in fast
> mode, repeatedly, rather than sitting in slow mode.
> This probably uses less power, and you can use the bluetooth module when
> you are awake.
Hmm... I can remember the older iPaq devices to do "short" wakeups for
checking battery state while charging. In this case the device did not
resume completely but only wake-up the CPU and SDRAM to check some
states and go to sleep again immediately afterwards.
Then this is probably a better approach if the slow mode consumes that
kernel concepts GbR Tel: +49-271-771091-12
Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48 Fax: +49-271-771091-19
D-57072 Siegen Mob: +49-176-21024535
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/neo1973-hardware/attachments/20070424/8c0f74ef/signature-0001.pgp
More information about the neo1973-hardware