Fwd: debian etch chroot, fix!
brian at ithil.org
Sun Aug 5 01:13:00 CEST 2007
On 03/08/07, Brian Brunswick <brian at ithil.org> wrote:
> armel seems like the best bet for performance indeed. I didn't know it was
> so far along.
But of course, armel doesn't work either with the current kernel, since armel
seems to change the syscall interface to always use SWI 0, and pass the
syscall in a register for extra speed. (Slight change in 64 bit
convention too I read)
So we would need a kernel compiled with that option too.
Please include one or the other of these options, since the ability to
chroot and use
pre-compiled software is pretty handy.
Brian_Brunswick____brian at ithil.org____Wit____Disclaimer____!Shortsig_rules!
More information about the openmoko-devel