Samsung documentation

[Andy Green]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> Andy,
> 
>> Wah if it means to hobble the product because of this issue it is a
>> mistake.  It is just my opinion but if we don't have 2442 open docs

> We will continue to work with Samsung on this, if we cannot convince
> them to go back to open that probably will speedup our switch to another
> CPU.

Understood.

Then in this case the job would become to do our best to find a better
CPU from another vendor that doesn't needlessly try to keep really
pretty harmless data private.  Then we don't "hobble the product".

It would be a big shame for Samsung though because we would definitely
be aiming to get 6400 into mainline kernel as part of our process, as we
discussed before.

- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH44E4OjLpvpq7dMoRAvA6AJ9wiC0XOHY9/Ane90l60JIqibaXuACeIWwm
uECnobW63ej6d5oGpf4M/08=
=Dc2B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----